In most species, a male specimen will usually don’t invest a lot of time or energy in caring for young when there is a good chance that he is not their father. There are how ever exceptions to this rule, such as the Ocellated wrasse.

Yale University researchers studying the breeding behaviour of this Mediterranean fish have found that a male Ocellated wrasse is more likely to care for the offspring when there is grave doubt about who actually fathered them.

The study also showed that female Ocellated wrasse will deposit more eggs in a nest where the nesting male is surrounded by non-nesting “sneaker males”; males who are keen to fertilize the eggs but have no plans ever caring for the offspring. Females will also deposit more eggs in nests where there are already large numbers of offspring.

“Parental male oscellated wrasse are more likely to care for offspring in this sperm-filled  environment than in nests in which there is less sexual competition”, said Suzanne H. Alonzo, assistant professor of ecology and evolutionary biology and co-author of the study.

Even though the caring male has a greater chance of ending up taking care of someone else’s offspring if he allow other males to hang around, he still benefits from having a lot of “sneaker males” near his nest since it will make the females deposit more eggs.

“While our simpler theories have trouble explaining the diversity of what we observe in nature, these patterns do have explanations,” Alonzo said. “The paper suggests we may have oversimplified the evolutionary dynamics of how these things work.”

The paper has been published in the edition of the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. The study was carried out by Suzanne H. Alonzo, assistant professor of ecology and evolutionary biology and Kellie L. Heckman, a postdoctoral fellow in the department.

In a new study on Tanganyika cichlids, three scientists[1] [2] [3] from Uppsala University in Sweden have shown that intricate rearing behaviour varies with brain size in females. The only previously published study showing similar patterns concerned predatory animals.

Tropheus moori – one of the species used in the study. – Picture www.jjphoto.dk

How the vertebrate brain has developed throughout the course of evolution is still not clear, and we are still not certain if brain functions in a specific species develop to match a demanding environment. One way of learning more about this is to compare brain size and structure in closely related species living under dissimilar circumstances.

“It is important to look at differences between males and females since females often distinguish themselves from males, both in behaviour and appearance”, says Niclas Kolm, lead-author of the study.

The study looked for correlations between brain size and ecological factors in a large number of specimens from 39 different species of Tanganyika cichlid. Lake Tanganyika is especially suitable for this type of study since it is inhabited by cichlid groups exhibiting significant dissimilarities in both brain structure and ecology, and whose ancestry is well known. Tanganyika cichlids varies dramatically from species to species when it comes to factors such as body size, diet, habitat, parental care, partner selection, dissimilarities between the sexes, mating behaviour, and brain structure.

The result of the study showed a correlation between brain size and the two factors diet and parental care behaviour. Species where only the female fish cares for egg and fry turned out to have bigger brains than species where both parents engage in parental care. The brain was however only larger in females; there was no difference in brain size between males of the two groups.

The largest brains of all were found in algae-eating cichlids. These fishes live in environments characterized by a high level of social interaction. “This indicates that social environment have played a role in brain development”, says Kolm.

The study was published in the web version of “Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B” on September 17. You can find it here (http://journals.royalsociety.org/content/j114062824820l76/).