Somewhere in the neighborhood of twenty-five percent of the surface water in China is so contaminated that it can’t even be used for industrial purposes. The sad thing about that figure is, while twenty-five percent is that contaminated, less than half of the total supply available is fit for human consumption. This data came from an environment watchdog this past Monday.

Inspectors in China have been painstakingly testing water samples from the major rivers and lakes for the first half of this year, and have proclaimed that just 49.3 percent of the water would be safe for human consumption. This number is actually up from the 48 percent of last year, the Ministry of Environmental Protection declared in a public notice from their website.

China has six grades they use for classifying their water supplies, with the first three grades being considered safe for human use, such as drinking and bathing.

Another 24.6 percent of the water supply was said to have fallen in categories four and five, which is only good for industrial or agricultural use. This leaves a total of 24.3 percent in category six, which is not suitable for any use at all.

This is an absolute appalling state of affairs, and despite tougher regulations being implemented over the past 10 years, the ministry is still struggling to keep tabs on thousands of paper mills, cement factories, and chemical plants which are pumping their industrial waste right into the water supplies of the country.

This is a serious problem, but it seems like it will be quite some time before they get a handle on it.

Out of the estimated 5.5 gigatonnes of carbon emitted each year by human activities, about 1.8 percent are removed from the air and stored by echinoderms such as starfish, sea urchins, brittle stars and sea lilies. This makes them less important “carbon sinkers” than plankton, but the finding is still significant since no one expected them to catch such a large chunk of our wayward carbon.

The new discovery is the result of a study* led by Mario Lebrato**, PhD student at the Leibniz Institute of Marine Science. The work was done when he was at the National Oceanography Centre, Southampton (NOCS) and affiliated with the University of Southampton’s School of Ocean and Earth Science (SOES).

“I was definitely surprised by the magnitude of the values reported in this study, but [the study’s] approach seems sound, so the reported numbers are probably fairly accurate,” says palaeoceanographer Justin Ries of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Ries also points out that these important creatures might be affected by ocean acidification.

“If the echinoderms end up being disproportionately susceptible to ocean acidification then it’s conceivable that the dissolving of echinoderm-derived sediments will be one of the earliest effects of ocean acidification on the global carbon cycle,” he explains. “In fact, maybe it already is.”
The body of an echinoderm consists of up to 80% calcium carbonate and according to the Lebrato study these hard-shelled animals collectively capture 100 billion tons of carbon each year.

“The realisation that these creatures represent such a significant part of the ocean carbon sink needs to be taken into account in computer models of the biological pump and its effect on global climate“, says Lebrato. “Our research highlights the poor understanding of large-scale carbon processes associated with calcifying animals such as echinoderms and tackles some of the uncertainties in the oceanic calcium carbonate budget. The scientific community needs to reconsider the role of benthic processes in the marine calcium carbonate cycle. This is a crucial but understudied compartment of the global marine carbon cycle, which has been of key importance throughout Earth history and it is still at present.”

The study has been published in the journal ESA Ecological Monographs.

* Mario Lebrato, Debora Iglesias-Rodriguez, Richard Feely, Dana Greeley, Daniel Jones, Nadia Suarez-Bosche, Richard Lampitt, Joan Cartes, Darryl Green, Belinda Alker (2009) Global contribution of echinoderms to the marine carbon cycle: a re-assessment of the oceanic CaCO3 budget and the benthic compartments. Ecological Monographs. doi: 10.1890/09-0553.

** mlebrato13 [at]googlemail.com

According to a new UN report, marine plants take 2 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide away from the atmosphere each year as they use the carbon dioxide for photosynthesis. Most of these plants are plankton, but planktons rarely form a permanent carbon store on the seabed. Instead, mangrove forests, salt marshes and seagrass beds are responsible for locking away well over 50 percent of all carbon that is buried in the sea – an amazing feat when you consider that these types of habitat only comprise 1 percent of the world’s seabed.

“The carbon burial capacity of marine vegetated habitats is phenomenal, 180 times greater than the average burial rate in the open ocean,” say the authors of the UN report.

Mangrove forests, salt marshes and seagrass beds are the most intense carbon sinks on our planet and they store away an estimated 1,650 million tonnes of carbon dioxide per year.

Unfortunately, these habitats are being ruined or damaged worldwide and a third of them are believed to have been lost already, although it is difficult to obtain accurate figures regarding the extent of these types of habitats worldwide. What we do know is that half of the world’s population lives within 65 miles of the ocean and that vegetated ocean near habitats are often under severe pressure.

“On current trends they may be all largely lost within a couple of decades”, said Christian Nellemann, the editor of the report.”

To help developing nations protect the remaining marine vegetated habitats the authors of the report suggest that a fund should be launched. They also wish to have a market place created where oceanic carbon sinks are traded in the same fashion as terrestrial forests.

The report, which has been named Blue Carbon, is a collaboration between the United Nations Environment Programme, the Food and Agriculture Organisation and Unesco.

Compared to the record-setting low years of 2007 and 2008, the Arctic Sea ice has made a slight recovery in 2009, according to the University of Colorado at Boulder’s National Snow and Ice Data Center. Despite this positive change, the minimum sea ice extent in 2009 was the third lowest since satellite record-keeping started in 1979.

“It’s nice to see a little recovery over the past couple of years, but there’s no reason to think that we’re headed back to conditions seen in the 1970s,” said NSIDC Director Mark Serreze, also a professor in CU-Boulder’s geography department. “We still expect to see ice-free summers sometime in the next few decades.”

The standard measurement for climate studies is the average ice extent during September. This September, the average Arctic Sea ice extent was 5.36 million square kilometres, which is 1.06 million square kilometres more than September 2007 and 690,000 square kilometres more than September 2008.

According to Mike Steele, Senior Oceanographer at the University of Washington, the decrease in ice loss is probably due to cloudy skies during late summer. Sea surface temperatures in the Arctic were higher than normal this season, but slightly lower than in 2007 and 2008 – most likely due to the presence of clouds this year. Atmospheric patterns in August and September also helped spreading the ice pack over a larger area.

Arctic sea ice follows an annual cycle of melting during the warm season and refreezing in the winter, and the extent of Arctic sea ice has always varied due to changing atmospheric conditions. During the past 30 years, there has however been a dramatic overall decline in Arctic sea ice extent.

“For the Florida Keys’ reefs, overall, the live coral cover has diminished by 50 to 80 percent in the past 10 years,” says Margaret Miller, a coral reef researcher at the National marine Fisheries Service. According to Miller, the destruction is the result of several contributing factors, such as pollution, climate change, over-fishing, and coastal developments.

“Corals are very susceptible to warming temperatures, because their lethal temperature [temperature at which they die] and their happy, normal temperature are very close, only separated by a couple of degrees,” Miller explains.

The reef building corals are not the only creatures in trouble in Florida; the situation looks dire for many reef associated species as well.

University of Miami marine professor Jerry Ault has studied marine life in the region for more than a decade.
“The research has discovered that about 70 percent of all the snapper and grouper in the Florida keys reef system are at population levels below those considered to be sustainable,” he said. “Everybody loves Florida because of the marine environment. Folks come here to fish and to dive and to take advantage of it, but we are loving it to death.”

According to predictions made by a team of NOAA-supported scientists from the Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium, Louisiana State University, and the University of Michigan, the Gulf of Mexico “dead zone” is likely to become record big this summer. If there predictions are true, we will see a dead zone the size of New Jersey (7,450 to 8,456 square miles). Additional flooding of the Mississippi River since May can however increase these numbers even further.

What is the Gulf of Mexico ‘dead zone’?

The dead zone is an area off the coast of Louisiana and Texas in the Gulf of Mexico where the oxygen level seasonally drops so low that most life forms living in and close to the bottom dies.

Dead zones are the result of large amounts of nutrients reaching the water, e.g. through waterways polluted by sewage and agricultural runoff. The excess nutrients stimulate rapid and massive algae growth in the affected area, a so called algae bloom. When the algae die, they sink to the bottom where oxygen dependant bacteria begin to break them down. The decomposition process consumes vast amounts of oxygen and soon the bottom and near-bottom waters become so oxygen depleted that all sorts of oxygen breathing organisms begin to die. This so called hypoxic area (an area where the oxygen levels are low to non-existent) is not just a problem for wildlife; it can also damage the economy of nearby states since it destroys habitat necessary for commercial and recreational Gulf fisheries.

The largest dead zone on record appeared in 2002 and measured 8,484 square miles.

Mississippi and Atchafalaya Rivers too rich in nutrients

During April and May this year, the Mississippi and Atchafalaya Rivers experienced heavy water flows that were 11 percent above average.

“The high water volume flows coupled with nearly triple the nitrogen concentrations in these rivers over the past 50 years from human activities has led to a dramatic increase in the size of the dead zone,” said Gene Turner, Ph.D., a lead forecast modeler from Louisiana State University.

“As with weather forecasts, this forecast uses multiple models to predict the range of the expected size of the dead zone“, said Robert Magnien, Ph.D., director of NOAA’s Center for Sponsored Coastal Ocean Research. “The strong track record of these models reinforces our confidence in the link between excess nutrients from the Mississippi River and the dead zone.”

Acesulfame K passes through the human body into wastewater, survives water treatment and accumulates in groundwater, Swiss researchers have found.

Acesulfame K turned out to be much more resilient towards treatment than saccharin, sucralose, and cyclamate – three other popular and commonly used artificial sweeteners.

The scientists tested tap water, urban groundwater, and both treated and untreated water samples from 10 different wastewater treatment plants. They also collected water samples from four rivers and eight lakes near Zurich and from a remote alpine lake.

In the untreated wastewaters, they could detect the presence of all four sweeteners (acesulfame K, saccharin, sucralose, and cyclamate), but in treated water 90% of saccharine and 99% of cyclamate were eliminated. Sucralose withstood treatment somewhat better, but the concentrations were still small. Surprisingly enough, acesulfame K proved much more resilient towards treatment and the equivalent of 10 milligrams per person per day could be detected in both untreated and treated waters.

Treated water often end up in lakes and rivers and no one knows whether acesulfame K has any impact on fish or the environment.

“These concentrations are astronomically high,” says Associate Professor Bruce Brownawell, an environmental chemist at Stony Brook University, New York “If I had to guess, this is the highest concentration of a compound that goes through sewage treatment plants without being degraded.”

The research team found no detectable amounts of artificial sweeteners in the remote alpine lake, but in the other rivers and lakes the amount of acesulfame K increase proportionally with nearby human population sizes. Acesulfame could also be detected in 65 of 100 groundwater samples and small amounts of the sweetener were also present in tap water. The levels detected are not considered detrimental to human health and were far too low to change the taste of the water.

The study has been published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology .

A group of conservationists and scientists are planning a research trip to the world’s largest rubbish pile; the Great Pacific Garbage Patch. Also known as the Eastern Garbage Patch, the Pacific Trash Vortex, or simply the Great Plastic Vortex; this gyre of marine litter has been gradually building over the last 60 years but we still know very little of this man-made monstrosity.

The expedition, headed by Hong Kong based entrepreneur and conservationist Doug Woodring, hopes to learn more about the nature of the vortex and investigate if it is possible to fish out the debris without causing even more harm.

“It will take many years to understand and fix the problem,” says Jim Dufour, a senior engineer at Scripps Institution of Oceanography in California, who is advising the trip.

According to Dufour, research expeditions like this one are of imperative importance since establishing the extent of the problem is vital for the future health of the oceans.

“It [the expedition] will be the first scientific endeavour studying sea surface pollutants, impact to organisms at intermediate depths, bottom sediments, and the impacts to organisms caused by the leaching of chemical constituents in discarded plastic,” he says.

The research crew, which will pass through the gyre twice on their 50-day journey from San Francisco to Hawaii and back, are using a 150-foot-tall (45-metre-tall) ship – the Kaisei, which is Japanese for Ocean Planet. They will also be accompanied by a fishing trawler responsible for testing various methods of catching the garbage without causing too much harm to marine life.

“You have to have netting that is small enough to catch a lot but big enough to let plankton go through it,” Woodring explains.

Last year, building contractor and scuba dive instructor Richard Owen formed the Environmental Cleanup Coalition (ECC) to address the issue of the pollution of the North Pacific. A plan designed by the coalition suggests modifying a fleet of ships to clear the area of debris and form a restoration and recycling laboratory called Gyre Island.

Hopefully, the garbage can not only be fished up but also recycled or used to create fuel, but a long term solution must naturally involve preventing the garbage from ending up there in the first place.

”The real fix is back on land. We need to provide the means, globally, to care for our disposable waste,” says Dufour.

Despite being sponsored by the water company Brita and backed by the United Nations Environment Programme, the expedition is still looking for more funding to meet its two million US dollar budget. Since the enormous trash pile is located in international waters, no single government feels responsible for cleaning it up or funding research. Another problem is lack of awareness; since very few people ever even come close to this remote part of the ocean it is difficult to make the problem a high priority issue. A documentary will be filmed during the expedition in hope of making the public more aware of where the world’s largest garbage dump is actually located.

What is the Eastern Garbage Patch?

According to data from the United Nations Environment Programme, our oceans contain roughly 13,000 pieces of plastic litter per square kilometre of sea. However, this trash is not evenly spread throughout the marine environment – spiralling ocean currents located in five different parts of the world are continuously sucking in vast amounts of litter and trapping it there. Of these five different gyres, the most littered one is located in the North Pacific – the Eastern Garbage Patch.

The five major oceanic gyres.

The existence of the Eastern Garbage Patch was first predicted in a 1988 paper published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) of the United States. NOAA based their prediction on data obtained from Alaskan research carried out in the mid 1980s; research which unveiled high concentrations of marine debris accumulating in regions governed by particular patterns of ocean currents. Using information from the Sea of Japan, the researchers postulated that trash accumulations would occur in other similar parts of the Pacific Ocean where prevailing currents were favourable to the formation of comparatively stable bodies of water. They specifically indicated the North Pacific Gyre.

California-based sea captain and ocean researcher Charles Moore confirmed the existence of a garbage patch in the North Pacific after returning home through the North Pacific Gyre after competing in the Transpac sailing race. Moore contacted oceanographer Curtis Ebbesmeyer who dubbed the region “the Eastern Garbage Patch” (EGP).

Twice the size of Texas

The Eastern Garbage Patch is located roughly 135° to 155°W and 35° to 42°N between Hawaii and mainland USA and is estimated to have grown to twice the size of Texas, even though no one knows for sure exactly how large the littered area really is. The garbage patch consists mainly of suspended plastic products that, after spending a long time in the ocean being broken down by the sun’s rays, have disintegrated into fragments so miniscule that most of the patch cannot be detected using satellite imaging.

Impact on wild-life and humans

The plastic soup resembles a congregation of zooplankton and is therefore devoured by animals that feed on zooplankton, such as jellyfish. The plastics will then commence their journey through the food chain until they end up in the stomachs of larger animals, such as sea turtles and marine birds. When ingested, plastic fragments can choke the unfortunate animal or block its digestive tract.

Plastics are not only dangerous in themselves, they are also known to absorb pollutants from the water, including DDT, PCB and PAHs, which can lead to acute poisoning or disrupt the hormonal system of animals that ingest them. This is naturally bad news for anyone who likes to eat marine fish and other types of sea food.

Researchers at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) unveiled a hazardous cocktail of pesticides when analysing the brain matter of 12 marine mammals; eleven cetaceans and one gray seal stranded near Cape Cod, Massachusetts.

This is the most extensive study of pollutants in marine mammals’ brains and it confirms suspicions of marine mammals being the carrier of a vast array of different chemicals that have found their way into marine ecosystems.

Lead author Eric Montie analyzed the cerebrospinal fluid and the gray matter of the cerebellum in the twelve animals and found them to contain a long row of different man-made chemicals, including a group of especially widespread substances labelled “the dirty dozen” by environmentalists. Many countries banned the “the dirty dozen” as early as the 1970s due to their adverse effect on human health, but they are unfortunately still present in our environment.

Montie didn’t just test for the presence of certain chemicals; he also measured their concentration and found one instance where it was surprisingly high.

“The biggest wakeup was that we found parts per million concentrations of hydroxylated PCBs in the cerebrospinal fluid of a gray seal”, says Montie. “That is so worrisome for me. You rarely find parts per million levels of anything in the brain.”

PCBs are neurotoxicants known to disrupt the thyroid hormone system. Other examples chemicals found in the tested mammals are DDT (diklorodifenyltriklorethane), which can cause cancer and disturb reproduction, and PBDEs (polybrominated diphenyl ethers); a type of flame retardants known to impair the development of motor activity and cognition.

Co-author Chris Reddy, a senior scientist in the WHOI Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry Department, describes the new study as “groundbreaking because Eric measures a variety of different chemicals in animal tissues that had not been previously explored. It gives us greater insight into how these chemicals may behave in marine mammals.”

The results of this study was published online April 17 in Environmental Pollution.

“The ‘underwater turbulence’ the jellies create is being debated as a major player in ocean energy budgets,” says marine scientist John Dabiri of the California Institute of Technology.

Jellyfish are often seen to be aimless aquatic drifters, propelled by nothing but haphazard currents and waves, but the truth is that these gooey creatures continuously contract and relax their bells to move in desired directions.

The jellyfish Mastigias papua carries algae-like zooxanthellae within its tissues from which it derives energy and since the zooxanthellae depend on photosynthesis, the jellyfish has to stay in sunny locations. Research carried out in the so called Jellyfish Lake, located in the island nation of Palau 550 miles east of the Philippines, shows that this jellyfish doesn’t rely on currents to bring it to sunny spots – it willingly budges through the lake as the sun moves across the sky.

In Jellyfish Lake, enormous congregations of Mastigias papua can be found in the western half of the lake each morning, eagerly awaiting dawn. As the sun rises in the east, all jellyfish turn towards it and starts swimming towards east. The smarmy creatures will swim for several hours until they draw near the eastern end of the lake. They will however never reach the eastern shore, since the shadows cast by trees growing along the shoreline cause them to stop swimming. They shun the shadows and will therefore come to a halt in the now sundrenched eastern part of the lake. As the solar cycle reverses later in the afternoon, millions of jellyfish will leave the eastern part of the lake and commence their journey back to the western shore.

Together with his research partner, marine scientists Michael Dawson of the University of California at Merced, John Dabiri have investigated how this daily migration of millions of jellyfish affects the ecosystem of the lake.

What the jellies are doing, says Dabiri, is “biomixing”. As they swim, their body motion efficiently churns the waters and nutrients of the lake.

Dabiri and Dawson are exploring whether biomixing could be responsible for an important part of how ocean, sea and lake waters form so called eddies. Eddies are circular currents responsible for bringing nitrogen, carbon and other elements from one part of a water body to another. The two researchers have already shown how Jellyfish like Mastigias papua and the moon jelly Aurelia aurita use body motion to generate water flow that transports small copepods within jellyfish feeding range; now they want to see if jellyfish movements make any impact on a larger scale.

“Biomixing may be a form of ‘ecosystem engineering’ by jellyfish, and a major contributor to carbon sequestration, especially in semi-enclosed coastal waters,” says Dawson.