The first-ever comprehensive global report on the state of shellfish has been released by The Nature Conservancy at the International Marine Conservation Congress in Washington, DC.

This one of its kind report is a collaborative work carried out by scientists from five different continents employed by academic and research institutions as well as by conservation organizations.

The report, which focuses primarily on the distribution and condition of native oyster reefs, show that 85 percent of oyster reefs have been completely destroyed worldwide and that this type of environment is the most severely impacted of all marine habitats.

In a majority of individual bays around the globe, the loss exceeds 90 percent and in some areas the loss of oyster reef habitat is over 99 percent. The situation is especially dire in Europe, North America and Australia where oyster reefs are functionally extinct in many areas.

“We’re seeing an unprecedented and alarming

decline in the condition of oyster reefs, a critically

important habitat in the world’s bays and estuaries,”

says Mike Beck, senior marine scientist at The Nature

Conservancy and lead author of the report.

Many of us see oysters as a culinary delight only, but oyster reefs provide us humans with a long row of valuable favours that we rarely think about. Did you for instance known that oyster reefs function as buffers that protect shorelines and prevent coastal marshes from disappearing, which in turn guard people from the consequences of hurricanes and other severe storm surges? Being filter feeders, oysters also help keep the water quality up in the ocean and they also provide food and habitat for many different types of birds, fish and shellfish.

Even though the situation is dismal, there is still time to save the remaining populations and aid the recuperation of damaged oyster reefs. In the United States, millions of young Olympia oysters have been reintroduced to the mudflats surrounding Netarts Bay in Oregon, in an effort to re-create a self-sustaining population of this native species. The project is a joint effort by government and university scientists, conservation groups, industry representatives, and local volunteers.

“With support from the local community and other partners, we’re demonstrating that shellfish restoration really works”, says Dick Vander Schaaf, Oregon director of coast and marine conservation for the Conservancy. “Expanding the effort to other bays and estuaries will help to ensure that the ecological benefits of oyster reefs are there for future generations.”

If wish to learn more about the global oyster reef situation, you can find the report here.

Genetic pattern analysis strongly suggests that California and British Columbia urchins are not connected via larval dispersal and comprise two distinct populations. Sea urchins have one of the longest larval periods of any known marine invertebrate and it has therefore been tempting to assume that ocean currents must be mixing urchin larvae all over the place, making it difficult for any distinct populations to form. But research results from the University of California now indicate that these two Pacific populations are two clearly separated ones.

Sea urchins –  Picture from the Red Sea

Together with former* graduate student Celeste Benham, marine biology professor Ron Burton of the University of California at San Diego have analyzed 500 adult sea urchins from Californian waters across five microsatellite markers and then compared the genetic patterns to an existing, similar database of 1,400 urchins from British Columbia. The Californian specimens were collected off the coast of San Diego, Los Angeles and Mendocino counties.

The genetic signatures found by Burton and Benham strongly suggest that the southern and northern populations are not connected via larval dispersal.

“From my evolutionary perspective, our results are important because they imply that, even on long time scales, there is no mixing, Burton explains. This means there is at least the potential for populations to adapt to different ocean conditions and gradually diverge. This is the first step in the two populations potentially becoming different species.”

This is the first time scientists have detected any population structure in the species. Similar studies carried out in the past have used fewer genetic markers and found no population genetics structure in the species despite having tested many different patches across its range.

“The take-home message of this study is that if you use more markers and newer techniques you will find some population differentiation that before nobody found,” says Burton.

* Benham is now a research assistant at the marine mammal laboratory at Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute in San Diego.

“The ‘underwater turbulence’ the jellies create is being debated as a major player in ocean energy budgets,” says marine scientist John Dabiri of the California Institute of Technology.

Jellyfish are often seen to be aimless aquatic drifters, propelled by nothing but haphazard currents and waves, but the truth is that these gooey creatures continuously contract and relax their bells to move in desired directions.

The jellyfish Mastigias papua carries algae-like zooxanthellae within its tissues from which it derives energy and since the zooxanthellae depend on photosynthesis, the jellyfish has to stay in sunny locations. Research carried out in the so called Jellyfish Lake, located in the island nation of Palau 550 miles east of the Philippines, shows that this jellyfish doesn’t rely on currents to bring it to sunny spots – it willingly budges through the lake as the sun moves across the sky.

In Jellyfish Lake, enormous congregations of Mastigias papua can be found in the western half of the lake each morning, eagerly awaiting dawn. As the sun rises in the east, all jellyfish turn towards it and starts swimming towards east. The smarmy creatures will swim for several hours until they draw near the eastern end of the lake. They will however never reach the eastern shore, since the shadows cast by trees growing along the shoreline cause them to stop swimming. They shun the shadows and will therefore come to a halt in the now sundrenched eastern part of the lake. As the solar cycle reverses later in the afternoon, millions of jellyfish will leave the eastern part of the lake and commence their journey back to the western shore.

Together with his research partner, marine scientists Michael Dawson of the University of California at Merced, John Dabiri have investigated how this daily migration of millions of jellyfish affects the ecosystem of the lake.

What the jellies are doing, says Dabiri, is “biomixing”. As they swim, their body motion efficiently churns the waters and nutrients of the lake.

Dabiri and Dawson are exploring whether biomixing could be responsible for an important part of how ocean, sea and lake waters form so called eddies. Eddies are circular currents responsible for bringing nitrogen, carbon and other elements from one part of a water body to another. The two researchers have already shown how Jellyfish like Mastigias papua and the moon jelly Aurelia aurita use body motion to generate water flow that transports small copepods within jellyfish feeding range; now they want to see if jellyfish movements make any impact on a larger scale.

“Biomixing may be a form of ‘ecosystem engineering’ by jellyfish, and a major contributor to carbon sequestration, especially in semi-enclosed coastal waters,” says Dawson.

An expansion of vertical seagrass occurring some 25 million years ago was probably what prompted seahorses to evolve from horizontal swimmers to upright creatures. If you live in vertical seagrass, an upright position is ideal since it allows you to stay hidden among the vertical blades.

This new idea is put forward in a report by Professor Beheregaray* and Dr Teske** published in the journal Biology Letters on May 6.

Sea horse picture from our Seahorse section.

Only two known fossils of seahorse have been found and this scarcity of fossil records has made it difficult for scientists to determine when seahorses evolved to swim upright. The older of the two fossils is “just” 13 million years old and no links between the two fossils and horizontally-swimming fish has been found.

“When you look back in time, you don’t see intermediate seahorse-like fish,” Beheregaray explains. There are however fish alive today that look like horizontally-swimming seahorses and Beheregaray and Teske have therefore studied them in hope of finding clues as to when seahorses made the transition from horizontal to vertical swimming.

By comparing DNA from seahorses with DNA from other species of the same family, Beheregaray and Teske were able to determine who the closest living relative to seahorses was.

“The pygmy pipehorses are by far the most seahorse-like fish on earth, says Beheregaray. “They do look like the seahorses, but they swim horizontally“.

When you have two closely related species, you can use molecular dating techniques to calculate when the two species diverged from each other. Beheregaray and Teske used a molecular dating technique that relies on the accumulation of differences in the DNA between the two species, and then used the two existing fossils to calibrate the rate of evolution of DNA in their molecular clock. By doing so, the two researchers could conclude that the last common ancestor of seahorses and pygmy pipehorses lived around 25 to 28 million years ago. At this point, something must have happened that led to the formation of two distinct species, and Beheregaray and Teske believe that this “thing” was the expansion of seagrass in the habitat where seahorses first evolved.

The time in history when seahorses arose, the Oligocene epoch, coincided with the formation of vast areas of shallow water in Austalasia. These shallow waters became overgrown with seagrass and turned into the perfect habitat for upright swimming seahorses that could remain hidden from predators among the vertical blades. The pygmy pipehorse on the other hand lived in large algae on reefs and had no use for an upright position, hence it continued to swim horizontally just like their common ancestor.

“The two groups split in a period when there were conditions favouring that split,” says Beheregaray. “It’s like us. We started walking upright when we moved to the savannahs. On the other hand, the seahorses invaded the new vast areas of seagrass.”

* Associate Professor Luciano Beheregaray of Flinders University

http://www.flinders.edu.au

** Dr Peter Teske of Macquarie University

http://www.macquarie.edu.au

According to University of Washington geologist and tsunami expert Jody Bourgeois, the idea that chevrons – a type of large U- or V-shaped formations found along certain coasts – were caused by mega-tsunamis is pure nonsense.

The term chevron refers a special type of vast dunes shaped a bit like the stripes on soldier’s uniform. They can be anything from hundreds of meters to a kilometre in length and can be seen in places such as Egypt, the Bahamas, Madagascar, and Australia.

Some scientists have suggested that a possible explanation for these mysterious stripes is mega-tsunamis caused by asteroid or comet impact. According to this school of thought, the chevrons may be deposits left by gigantic tsunamis 4,800 to 5,000 years ago, tsunamis that might have been up to 10 times larger than the earthquake-caused Indian Ocean tsunami of December 2005. Due to the location of known chevrons, the Indian Ocean has been suggested as ground zero for the comet or asteroid impact.

Bourgeois, a professor of Earth and space sciences who has studied earthquakes and tsunamis in various parts of the world, does not agree. According her, the chevrons are not lined up the way you would expect from deposits caused by gigantic waves. Many of the chevrons on Madagascar are for instance parallel to the coastline, instead of perpendicular to the shore.

Models created by Bourgeois’ colleague Robert Weiss, assistant professor of geology at

Texas A&M University, show that deposits formed by gigantic tsunamis would point in the same direction as the waves were travelling when the reached land, which is mostly perpendicular to the shore.

“And if it really was from an impact, you should find evidence on the coast of Africa too, since it is so near,” Bourgeois explains.

The computer model generated actual conditions for a tsunami which made it possible to use the model to explore the effects of an asteroid or comet hitting the part of the Indian Ocean suggested by mega-tsunami chevron proponents. According to the model, the gigantic waves would approach land at a 90-degree orientation to the chevron deposits.

“The model shows such a tsunami could not have created these chevrons, unless you have some unimaginable process at work,” Bourgeois says.

Bourgeois and Weiss have used satellite images from Google Earth to get close-up looks at chevrons in different locations. Chevron are most common in coastal regions but you can find quite a lot of them in semiarid inland areas as well.

Bourgeois and Weiss wrap up their paper, which can be found in the May issue of the journal Geology, by stating that “the extraordinary claim of ‘chevron’ genesis by megatsunamis cannot withstand simple but rigorous testing. […] There are the same forms in the Palouse in eastern Washington state, and those are clearly not from a tsunami.”

The members of the genus Synodontis, commonly known as the squeaker catfishes of Lake Tanganyika, evolved from a single common ancestor according to a paper* published in a recent issue of the Journal of Evolutionary Biology.

synodontis catfish

Researchers Day, Bills and Friel** analysed 1697 base-pair sequences consisting of nuclear (ribosomal protein-codin gene S7), mitochondrial (cytochrome b) and transfer RNA gene fragments in 65 samples (representing about 40 species) of squeaker catfishes to study the evolutionary relationships of the group.

Through their research, the authors were able to track down a single origin for the Lake Tanganyika species flock. The members of the genus Synodontis all evolved within the last 5.5 million years which makes them a comparatively new addition to this Great Rift Valley Lake which is believed to be at least 9 million, perhaps even 12 million, years old.

Day, Bills and Friel also recovered a monophyletic group of southern African riverine species which seems to have diversified very rapidly (during the last 890,000 years). This group was believed to have been formed due to adaptive radiation within Lake Makgadikgadi; a lake which is now extinct.

* Day, JJ, R Bills & JP Friel (2009) Lacustrine radiations in African Synodontis catfish. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22, pp. 805–817.

**Julia Day, Roger Bills and John Friel

As part of a reef restoration study, researchers removed 20 specimens of the Caribbean giant barrel sponge from the Conch Reef off of Key Largo, Florida and then re-attached them using sponge holders consisting of polyvinyl chloride piping. The sponge holders were anchored in concrete blocks set on a plastic mesh base. Some sponges were reattached at a depth of 15 meters and some further down at 30 metres.

Venus Flower Basket sponge. A deep sea glass species.

The results of the study now show that sponges are capable of reattaching themselves to reefs if we help them by keeping them properly secured during the recuperation period. After being held stationary by sponge holders for as little as 6 months the sponges had reattached themselves to the Conch Reef. Of the 20 specimens reattached in 2004 and 2005, 62.5 percent survived at least 2.3-3 years and 90 percent of the sponges attached in deep water locations survived. During the study period, the area endured no less than four hurricanes.

This is very good news for anyone interested in reef restoration, since the new technique can be used to rescue sponges that have been dislodged from reefs by human activities or storms. Each year, a large number of sponges are extricated from reefs by human activities such as vessel groundings and the cutting movements of chains and ropes moving along with debris in strong currents. Severe storms can also rip sponges from the reef, which wouldn’t be a problem if it weren’t for the fact that so many sponges are also being removed by human activities. When combined, storms and human activities risk decimating sponge populations. Old sponges can be hundreds or even thousands of years old and their diameter can exceed 1 meter (over 3 feet). Sponges of such an impressive size and age can naturally not be rapidly replaced by new sponges if they die.

Sponges can survive for quite a while after being dislodged but is difficult for them to reattach themselves to reefs without any help since they tend to be swept away by currents and end up between reef spurs on sand or rubble, where they slowly erode and eventually die.

“The worldwide decline of coral reef ecosystems has prompted many local restoration efforts, which typically focus on reattachment of reef-building corals,” says Professor Joseph Pawlik of the University of North Carolina-Wilmington, co-author of the study. “Despite their dominance on coral reefs, large sponges are generally excluded from restoration efforts because of a lack of suitable methods for sponge reattachment.”

The results of the study, which were published in Restoration Ecology, show that we can help the sponges to survive by using the new technique. Earlier attempts were less successful since they relied on cement or epoxy; two types of adhesives that do not bind well to sponge tissue.

Japanese eel (Anguilla japonica) larvae have amazing buoyancy compared to other oceanic plankton, and the reason may be a type of gelatinous goo contained within the body.

When researchers from the University of Tokyo measured the specific gravity of Japanese eel larvae, they found it to be as low as 1.019, rising to 1.043 – showing the larvae to be potentially lighter than seawater itself. (Sea water has an average specific gravity of 1.024.)

When they checked other marine creatures for comparison, such as juvenile jellyfish and the sea snail Hydromyles, their specific gravity turned out range from 1.020 to 1.425. Of 26 plankton creatures tested, the Japanese eel larva was the lightest.

The food consumed by Japanese eel larvae and many other planktons tend to be found in the greatest abundance really close to the water’s surface where there is plenty of light. The low specific gravity may therefore increase the survival rate of Japanese eels by making it easier for them to find a lot of things to eat.

So, why does the Japanese eel float so well? According the Japanese study, the answer may rest in gelatinous goo – or more specifically in a matrix of transparent gelatinous glycosamino-glycans. Controlled by osmoregulation through the chloride cells that cover the body of a Japanese eel larva, this marvellous adaptation makes it possible for the larva to stay close to the surface. Researchers have also suggested that it might help the larva to stay away from predators.

For more information, see the paper: Tsukamoto K, Yamada Y, Okamura A, Kaneko T, Tanaka H, Miller MJ, Horie N, Mikawa N, Utoh, T and S Tanaka (2009) – Positive buoyancy in eel leptocephali: an adaptation for life in the ocean surface layer. Marine Biology, vol. 156, no. 5. pp. 835-846.

A Taiwan research team has successfully extracted a brain-boosting nutrient from squid skin, according to an announcement made by the Council of Agriculture’s Fisheries Research Institute.

The nutrient in question is phospholipid docosahexaenoic acid, commonly known as PL-DHA, a substance known to improve a persons memory and enhance learning ability.

According to the institute official, PL-DHA is superior to TG-DHA another form of docosahexaenoic acid commonly found in deep-sea fish oil — when it comes to inhibiting degradation of the intellect since PL-DHA can cross the blood brain barrier and be absorbed directly by the brain.

Researchers at the institute have also showed that PL-DHA is effective in reviving neural cells and enhancing the content of three oxidation-resistant enzymes — GSH, CAT and SOD. In addition to this, the fatty acid will moderate the oxidative damage to neural cells that can be induced by free radicals in the body, which means that it will decrease the pace of plaque and tangle accumulation in brain cells.

Quoting medical reports, the institute official stressed that Alzheimer’s and other forms of senile dementia is known to be associated with the accumulation of plaque and tangles in the brain.

A recent study on intersex abnormalities in fish living in the Potomac River watershed carried out by researchers from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the U.S. Geological Survey showed that at least 82 percent of male smallmouth bass and in 23 percent of the largemouth bass had immature female germ cells (oocytes) in their reproductive organs. This number is even larger than anticipated.

This type of intersex indicates that the fish has been exposed to estrogens or chemicals that mimic the activity of natural hormones. The condition is believed to be caused by hormone-like chemicals, so called endocrine disruptors, found in medicines and a variety of consumer products. Earlier, researchers suspected that the contaminants were entering the Potomac from the wastewater treatment plants that discharge into it, but further sampling showed that the problem existed in areas located upstream from sewage plants as well. Officials are now investigating if multiple chemicals, and not just those from sewage plants, may be responsible. A larger study that includes the entire Potomac River and other East Coast rivers will be launched to find out how widespread the problem actually is.

“At the moment we don’t know the ecological implications of this condition and it could potentially affect the reproductive capability of important sport fish species in the watershed,” said Leopoldo Miranda, Supervisor of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Chesapeake Bay Field Office.

The Potomac River is the fourth largest river along the Atlantic coast of the USA (in terms of area), with a length of approximately 665 km (383 statute miles) and a drainage area of roughly 38,000 km² (14,700 square miles). It flows into the Chesapeake Bay along the mid-Atlantic coast of the U.S. The river is shared by West Virginia, Maryland, Virginia, and District of Columbia, and all of Washington, D.C., the nation’s capital city, lies within the Potomac watershed.

More information is available in the Intersex fact sheet released by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Chesapeake Bay Field Office.