Element
07-14-2007, 05:26 AM
Hello everyone, registered here last night but haven't introduced myself in the appropriate forum yet...I've never owned a fish tank and would love to eventually move to a SW tank but figure I better cut my teeth on a FW first :)
I've been researching the heck out of how to cycle a tank and all the other fun research that I like to do when starting a new hobby. Only pets I currently have (had) are a cat and a few tarantulas, leaf insects (10" or so ;) ), centipedes, scorpions, and true spiders. But more on that when/if I write an introduction thread lol
Anyway...back to the topic at hand. Today I received my electric bill from the utility company and in it was included the water quality results from 2006 (yes, my electric company also is in charge of water supply...LUS - Lafayette Utility Systems). I wanted to post the results here to see what everyone thought of them as far as how "bad"/"good" it is. The one thing that caught my eye was that there was no mention of chlorine but I swear I've tasted it on occasion...then again, I'm not a chemist by trade (my background is electrical) so maybe it was some other chemical?
They gave it in three sections which I will title below (I'll leave out the extra info such as what the major sources are and the EPA designated contaminant level and max level goal...all of which these test results are FAR below):
"Monitored Before Any Treatment; substance - LUS maximum"
-------------------------------------------------------
Atrazine - 0.281 ppb
Barium - 0.207 ppm
Fluoride - 0.26ppb
"Monitored in the water distribution system; substance - LUS maximum"
-------------------------------------------------------
Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM) - 12.3 ppb
Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) - 6.4ppb
"Monitored at customer's tap; substance - LUS results at 90th percentile testing *note: no individual sample exceeded the Action Level*"
-------------------------------------------------------
Copper - 0.028 ppm or less
Lead - 0.302 ppb or less
And that's it...so, what do ya'll think?
I've been researching the heck out of how to cycle a tank and all the other fun research that I like to do when starting a new hobby. Only pets I currently have (had) are a cat and a few tarantulas, leaf insects (10" or so ;) ), centipedes, scorpions, and true spiders. But more on that when/if I write an introduction thread lol
Anyway...back to the topic at hand. Today I received my electric bill from the utility company and in it was included the water quality results from 2006 (yes, my electric company also is in charge of water supply...LUS - Lafayette Utility Systems). I wanted to post the results here to see what everyone thought of them as far as how "bad"/"good" it is. The one thing that caught my eye was that there was no mention of chlorine but I swear I've tasted it on occasion...then again, I'm not a chemist by trade (my background is electrical) so maybe it was some other chemical?
They gave it in three sections which I will title below (I'll leave out the extra info such as what the major sources are and the EPA designated contaminant level and max level goal...all of which these test results are FAR below):
"Monitored Before Any Treatment; substance - LUS maximum"
-------------------------------------------------------
Atrazine - 0.281 ppb
Barium - 0.207 ppm
Fluoride - 0.26ppb
"Monitored in the water distribution system; substance - LUS maximum"
-------------------------------------------------------
Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM) - 12.3 ppb
Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) - 6.4ppb
"Monitored at customer's tap; substance - LUS results at 90th percentile testing *note: no individual sample exceeded the Action Level*"
-------------------------------------------------------
Copper - 0.028 ppm or less
Lead - 0.302 ppb or less
And that's it...so, what do ya'll think?