View Full Version : Carbon Or No Carbon
Yankee
02-27-2007, 11:30 PM
I've noticed that some of you don't use carbon. I have an Emperor 400 that comes with carbon in the filters. Should I be removing it? Also I've never put any media in the media containers, (in the month I've had fish in the tank). How much of a benifet are those media containers? I have a 55gal. tank with a 4" Dempsey, a 31/2" Firemouth and a small Pleco and so far my water has been in good shape.
Thanks
Chrona
02-28-2007, 12:23 AM
Most people that don't use carbon have planted tanks, since carbon strips trace elements needed by the plants. If you don't have live plants, carbon is great imo.
xoolooxunny
02-28-2007, 01:07 AM
Remember, and I think I'm quoting William when i say this, but what works for some people doesn't work for others. But this is what i do.
I use carbon in my filter, but i also have a planted tank. I tried not using carbon, but i found that the water started to smell. So I started using carbon again, and paired with my fluorite, i use flourish tabs in the substrate, and now i have absolutely no algae on my plants, the water is crystal clear and is odor free.
I'll drink it.
Chrona
02-28-2007, 01:19 AM
Remember, and I think I'm quoting William when i say this, but what works for some people doesn't work for others. But this is what i do.
I use carbon in my filter, but i also have a planted tank. I tried not using carbon, but i found that the water started to smell. So I started using carbon again, and paired with my fluorite, i use flourish tabs in the substrate, and now i have absolutely no algae on my plants, the water is crystal clear and is odor free.
I'll drink it.
What kind of plants do you have? It is possible they are all root feeders, and so don't need trace elements from the water column. I don't know, and don't feel like starting up the whole carbon debate :)
cocoa_pleco
02-28-2007, 02:10 AM
My tanks are 100% unreal planted right now so i do use carbon
xoolooxunny
02-28-2007, 02:15 AM
Mostly root feeders, you're right. But when I stopped using carbon, the water smelled and the plants were healthy. Started using carbon again, and the water is beautiful and the plants were covered in hair algae. when i kept the carbon in and added some more fertilizer, the algae problem cleared 98% (water changes take care of the fake decor). i don't want to debate either, I'd rather exchange personal experience issues.:thumb: :10:
Severus
02-28-2007, 04:22 AM
I was not using carbon for awhile and i found my water to be a little cloudy with some excess algea. I put fresh carbon back in and my water is a lot better, i am going to stick with it for awhile and see how it goes. Also, my tank is not planted
Yankee
02-28-2007, 10:17 AM
I have all fake plants so I'll stick with the carbon, thanks.
Lady Hobbs
02-28-2007, 10:34 AM
I don't use carbon and use instead the filter floss. I started buying the Aqua bags that you fill yourself with either the carbon that comes with it or using floss.
Both have their downsides. Small pieces of floss can get into the tank now and then and get tangled up in plants or the filter. Too much of it causes the bio wheels to stop turning, as well.
Carbon is suspected to be a cause of HITH disease which cichlids are suspectible to. I've also read not to use it in Angelfish or Discus tanks so that made me feel possibly this was not such a good thing. And they are expensive. I suspect that people that have had problems with carbon filters is how long they continue using the same filter. Especially when someone writes "I have used the same filter for 6 months. I just clean it off." Hello! I can just see under a microscope the moving, living bacteria living on that thing.
The carbon in filters only last a couple of weeks. Using them constantly will make them ineffective for removing medications after a short period of time.
So.......to use carbon or not is a good question. I am still looking for something more effective than carbon OR floss.
Fishguy2727
02-28-2007, 12:42 PM
I have stopped using carbon in all my tanks (only one is planted) and so far I see no difference. Besides removing meds, carbon's main uses are removing discoloration (a yellowish tint to the water due to biological activity and low quality foods) and odors. However by keeping up with my water changes I have no issue with either and avoid the problems of removal of trace elements essential to the fish. So it seems to me that carbon is treating a symptom and not the actual problem. So I keep up with my (large) weekly water changes and take care of the problem, not just the symptoms. I do not feel that in a modestly stocked tank you would need as large of water changes as I do to avoid the mentioned problems.
jeffs99dime
02-28-2007, 01:16 PM
i also do not use carbon.
Willyleigh
02-28-2007, 08:25 PM
I'll drink it.
I once got a bit or tank water in my mouth while I was syphoning my tank and I have to say that it was the nicest water that I have ever tasted.
I wouldn't drink it by choice, it has a very slight brown colour and a very earthy smell to it but it tasted great!
Chrona
02-28-2007, 09:21 PM
I once got a bit or tank water in my mouth while I was syphoning my tank and I have to say that it was the nicest water that I have ever tasted.
I wouldn't drink it by choice, it has a very slight brown colour and a very earthy smell to it but it tasted great!
I'm going to refer to Lauren B's avatar and say that you shouldn't drink tank water because fish have sex in it.
xoolooxunny
02-28-2007, 09:26 PM
thumbs2: lets have a tank water drinking party!thumbs2:
Severus
03-01-2007, 01:55 AM
thumbs2: lets have a tank water drinking party!thumbs2:
I think ill pass! lol. All of that fish pee and god knows what else floating around in there! eww
muffin
03-03-2007, 06:38 PM
"What doesn't kill you can only make you stronger" right?
I'll raise a glass to that...
xoolooxunny
03-03-2007, 06:42 PM
:19: yes! i have a taker! thumbs2:
cocoa_pleco
03-03-2007, 06:48 PM
out of 10 years i must have accidentally drank 5 gallons of fish water so far. ewww
Cichlid_Man
03-03-2007, 07:22 PM
Tank water is probably better for you than what comes out of a tap if you are on a well!
Anyway, back to the carbon thing.
I don't use carbon now for the past year, but for years before I did.
Nothing wrong with it, just another thing to buy and it doesn't do much unless you change it weekly.
Why bother?
Glasstapper
03-04-2007, 03:48 PM
I think ill pass! lol. All of that fish pee and god knows what else floating around in there! eww
I'll pass, too. After seeing how many worms can show up after missing only one water change (see my experiment in the general forum), I'd have to say "ee[Only Registered Users Can See Links.]", as well. lol.
Incredulous_Ed
03-05-2007, 07:30 PM
I'll pass, too. After seeing how many worms can show up after missing only one water change (see my experiment in the general forum), I'd have to say "ee[Only Registered Users Can See Links.]", as well. lol.
gross! after your experiment, tank water is not going anywhere near my mouth ever again!
I do not use carbon anymore. I save alot of money by not using it, and I agree with hobbs that some fish should not be kept with it. I do not reccomend using it in a planted tank. You should try using carbon for a bit, and then using no carbon for a bit. See how it works (or doesn't) for you. I think if you carry out large water changes on a regular basis there is no need for carbon.
Just my 2 cents worth....
vBulletin v3.5.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.