JaredCBell
12-15-2008, 11:36 PM
This doesnt really relate too much to aquariums but in a way it does and I am trying to prove a point to my brother and I believe you people, with your extensive knowledge of both marine and freshwater fish, will help with that.
He (along with many Scientists) believe that the earth was once all freshwater. I believe this to be impossible because of the certain species of fish (and mammals) that could basically only live in marine water and by evidence thats what they were designed for.
Now, without getting into a creation and evolution debate, he is on the side of creation so to him, there is no possibility of evolution, just adaptation. Which I also believe but I want to prove a single point that marine fish were designed for marine water and vise versa....It couldnt have been all freshwater and then slowly they starting adapting to where they could only live in salt water.
Make sense? I tried using examples of fish and inverts that are ONLY found in freshwater so to say that they came from nowhere would then start supporting evolution and would then debunk his whole argument. I just dont have too much knowledge on marine fish.
Sorry my argument points are all over the place I just want to know what I can throw at him to help support my theory.
Now if you all believe that the earth was all freshwater, then I am screwed... thumbs2:
*Other reason I am doing this is because he is going to try and prove that a GSP can live fully in freshwater. Thats how this whole argument started. Im trying to tell him, it wont.*
He (along with many Scientists) believe that the earth was once all freshwater. I believe this to be impossible because of the certain species of fish (and mammals) that could basically only live in marine water and by evidence thats what they were designed for.
Now, without getting into a creation and evolution debate, he is on the side of creation so to him, there is no possibility of evolution, just adaptation. Which I also believe but I want to prove a single point that marine fish were designed for marine water and vise versa....It couldnt have been all freshwater and then slowly they starting adapting to where they could only live in salt water.
Make sense? I tried using examples of fish and inverts that are ONLY found in freshwater so to say that they came from nowhere would then start supporting evolution and would then debunk his whole argument. I just dont have too much knowledge on marine fish.
Sorry my argument points are all over the place I just want to know what I can throw at him to help support my theory.
Now if you all believe that the earth was all freshwater, then I am screwed... thumbs2:
*Other reason I am doing this is because he is going to try and prove that a GSP can live fully in freshwater. Thats how this whole argument started. Im trying to tell him, it wont.*